Sound Off: World Views and The Empowerment Factor

Co-Creating our Future

The Quantity C vs. Gods Thoughts On The God Particle – Fundamental Existence Basics

1 Comment

As we look at our quaint, and stagnant evolutionary energy trends, along with the emerging ($ funded and supported) scientific leaders in NON-ADVANCED (pun intended) energy systems, we might do well to step back and re-evaluate where we are headed, and what, perhaps, did we miss in Physics’ standard model, supposedly the  foundation upon which we exist.  http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/our-energy-choices/energy-trends.html

As the article on the God Particle below suggests, “it is inescapable that two worldviews, one scientific and technical, the other human and experiential, must either collide or converge”.

But more than that, are we not ignoring some of the most basic and fundamental relationship concepts in the matter-energy-space-time-field realms long since discovered and unapplied?

Such as ….Matter-energy-space-time-field relationships precisely determined by the degree of curvature of the Quantity C radius which exist between any two reference points. The Quantity C representing the Radius of Curvature of all Natural Law, more appropriately defined as “the kinetic energy equivalent of the mass energy of matter”. 

E-mc2-Bodanis-DavidAn impressive and historical view of E=MC2 presented by David Bodanis presents the opportunity for questions:  E=mc²: A Biography of the World’s Most Famous Equation by David Bodanishttp://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2802.E_mc_

The book begins with the separate and isolated recognitions of the conservation of mass, and the conservation of energy, “ all the mass there is – really were parts of a single connected whole, and vice versa, “all the energy there is – really were parts of a single connected whole, each magically balanced, with nothing connecting the two realms. Then along came Einstein with his E=mc2, showing how the two realms were one, leading to many of the crude and elementary tunnels/connections to each, such as a high speed neutron will not split the uranium atom, but has to be slowed down to thermal velocity so it can settle into the nucleus. Elementary connective observations were also made in astrophysics, for example, the dense core of a star is under a lot of pressure, and pressure is also a form of energy, and energy is another sort of mass…….

But where are the rest of the relationships of matter-energy-space-time-field realms and their common denominators of frequency and vibration?

selfevident

We know the natural laws are not absolute, but relative. That is, the size and shape of the curve of one law is dependent upon the value and position of the others.

We have seen that the nucleus of the atom of uranium 235 dips below the zero line with the addition of only one mass unit, making a total of 236, yet the nucleus of the atom of uranium 238, although close to the zero line is still on the positive side of the curve because of the fact that the shape of the gravitational curve is modified not only by the mass present but also by the number and position of the electrical charges.

time-space

When we state that the quantity C is the radius of the curvature of natural law, we mean simply that if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point. Read More StarSteps

Further explorations into the elementary basics of the quantity C, would clarify and complete Einstein’s 1928 unified field theory, putting the God Particle, strings theories, and theories of everything in their respective place.

What Would God Think of the God Particle? – Part 1  http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/What-Would-God-Think-of-the-God-Particle-Part-1-4912449.php#!    As Rolf-Dieter Heuer, director of the LHC project, stated in a 2011 talk, “The Higgs is neither matter nor force. The Higgs is just different.” We won’t go into the differences here, except to say that there is reason to assume that the Higgs isn’t one of a kind but the opening wedge to an entire class of so-called scalar particles. One optimistic view of the results observed so far holds that the discovery will lead to new developments in particle physics. These would open up a finer level of the quantum domain and thus bring physics closer to its holy grail, a Theory of Everything, a grandiose-sounding, particle-based view of the cosmos.
The more pessimistic overview,( but as its proponents claim more realistic,) states that the LHC results have not given any evidence of the existence of other particles that would be needed to continue our understanding of the physics beyond the Higgs, to what is expected to be the next theoretical development, dubbed supersymmetry. As such, there’s a major snag in attempts to ultimately develop a Theory of Everything. Even leaving arguments related to theories of physics aside, such a theory, as envisaged, doesn’t say anything and in fact cannot say anything about life, evolution and the phenomena of mind and awareness. It is not even clear how gravity, the last of the four forces of nature described by general relativity, will fit into the Standard Model – at this point, a great deal of current theory, including the widely touted superstring theory, is interesting speculation.

It is inescapable that two worldviews, one scientific and technical, the other human and experiential, must either collide or converge. That is, the universe must make room for how human beings evolved in order to investigate the creation that gave rise to us. Any Theory of Everything that leaves the human dimension out – as particle physics tries overwhelmingly to do – cannot reach its goal. The Higgs boson, as viewed from the world we all experience every day, isn’t simply arcane. It leads toward a collision of worldviews rather than a convergence.

Advertisements

Author: peterjocis

Understanding: .................... Understanding disolves the pseudo dichotomies revealed by StarSteps, with scientific validation of the age old philosophies surmised by Walter Russell and Judge Thomas Troward, merging physics and metaphysics (Plato’s suggestion); Understanding the radius of curvature, symbolized by our ancestors with the circle & sine wave, un-hides the hidden variables, removes the foundational problems described in The Trouble With Physics, and as previously stated, leads toward self recognition of very advanced and practical solutions to contemporary “issues” on the tripod of reality - physical, mental/social, and the vague spiritual dimension revealed by the ‘zero point’ of no time, no space, also found in the realm of advanced martial arts and meditation. ......................... The statement from a well known book, “Let there be Light” is now enhanced with far more practical meaning: Light’s velocity, converted into an energy differential is the measure of the radius of curvature of all natural law; This same energy differential (VC) is the total energy contained in each and every gram of atomic mass. It could be said, everything we see and touch is light in motion or light stationary. ............................. http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com/2010/01/its-musical-universe.html . Evolution, unimpeded, does not create the conditions of today. .......................... Reference links: • StarSteps Part one http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps1.pdf • StarSteps Part Two http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps2.pdf • StarSteps Part Three http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps3.pdf • http://www.fuel2000.net • http://freedomtimes.blogspot.com • http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com • http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com/2010/01/its-musical-universe.html .............................. Aside from the cold fusion, zero point, sympathetic vibratory physics and StarSteps pdf links provided in the original post, those interested in further exploration where the QC radius of curvature sheds credible insight: ............................ • Dr Brian O’Leary - The Sustainable Technology Solution Revolution: http://www.brianoleary.info • The New Energy Movement http://www.newenergymovement.org • Cal Physics Institute - Zero Point Energy http://www.calphysics.org/index.html • Cold Fusion http://coldfusionnow.org • Dr Paul LaViolette (subquantum kinetics) http://etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/Book-Secrets.html • Shedding light on Walter Russell http://www.svpvril.com/mus

One thought on “The Quantity C vs. Gods Thoughts On The God Particle – Fundamental Existence Basics

  1. Dear Sir, before i read yoour article in affirmation of your thoughts i had this to say about God Particle-Theophanies & Theories: Information and visual imagery carriers [prototypes, archetypes and character types]

    “The 3rd World War: Creative & Constructionist Inspiration by Theophanies & Theories.
    Nature and the Invisible Ream Interactions”

    You can get some evidence of what i associate with the terminologies at http://www.jmkariuki.co.ke [click cause link [for identical imagery inscribed by intuition and what appeared as a sun’s corona activity confirmation]…..and yes am at a war path with the so called standard explanation of reality….

    Delighted John[Watch Kenya & Israel]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s